The Advantages Of The Completed Contract Method

The Advantages Of The Completed Contract Method

A taxpayer must treat costs incurred before the 10-percent year as pre-contracting-year costs described in paragraph of this section. A hybrid variation of accounting for long-term projects is the exempt percentage of completion method , where general and administrative costs and directs job costs are deducted with the accrual method, which are deducted when the liability for those costs are incurred. The main advantage of EPCM is that income is reported over the life of the contract and any losses will be recognized based on the percentage of the contract completed, called the completion factor. The completion factor is the amount of work that has been completed compared to the estimated amount remaining. The completion factor must be certified by an engineer or an architect, or supported by appropriate documentation.

  • The percentage-of-completion method is the alternative to the completed contract method commonly used by contractors.
  • If a contract meets the definition of a residential contract, then a hybrid method can be utilized.
  • In Year 2, X reports receipts of $500,000 (the completion factor multiplied by the total contract price and minus the Year 1 gross receipts [($600,000/$800,000 × $1,000,000)-$250,000]) and costs of $400,000, for a profit of $100,000.
  • The primary disadvantage of this method is that the contractor does not necessarily recognize income in the period earned.
  • The CCM allows a taxpayer to defer the recognition of income and related tax liability until the contract is completed.
  • X and the other three partners of PRS share equally in its capital, profits, and losses.

The percentage-of-completion method is the alternative to the completed contract method commonly used by contractors. When you apply the percentage-of-completion method, you will record revenues, profits and expenses as they happen. Additionally, this method requires contractors to recognize revenue every year during the project as a percentage of the completed contract. The disadvantage of this method is that you do not defer your tax liability to a future period.


We specialize in serving auto dealerships, construction operations, energy and natural resources, financial institutions, healthcare physicians and practices, and nonprofit and governmental agencies, throughout West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky. MKS&H is committed to providing personalized tax and accounting services while developing a deep understanding of you, your culture, and your business goals.

Who should use percentage of completion?

The IRS requires contractors to use percentage of completion for long-term construction projects. The only exceptions are for home construction and small contractors. The small contractor contract exception depends on two conditions: the size of the project and the size of the contractor.

PRS correctly estimates at the end of Year 2 that it will have to incur an additional $75,000 of allocable contract costs in Year 3 to complete the contract (rather than $150,000 as originally estimated by PRS). C, whose taxable year ends December 31, determines completed contract method the income from long-term contracts using the PCM. During 2001, C buys land and begins constructing a building that will contain 50 condominium units on that land. C enters into a contract to sell one unit in this condominium to B for $240,000.

This paragraph applies with respect to transactions and sales occurring pursuant to contracts entered into in years beginning on or after July 12, 1995. Trickle-Up Economics Describes the best tax policy for any country to maximize happiness and economic wealth, based on simple economic principles.

C, whose taxable year ends December 31, uses the CCM to account for exempt construction contracts. Under the terms of the contract, B agrees to pay C a total of $1,000,000 for construction of the factory. When B takes possession of the factory and begins operations in December 2002, B is dissatisfied with the location and workmanship of certain heating ducts. As of the end of 2002, C contends that the heating ducts are constructed in accordance with contract specifications. The amount of the gross contract price reasonably in dispute with respect to the heating ducts is $6,000.

Please Complete The Security Check To Access Www Allbusinesscom

In Year 1, X incurs costs of $600,000 and receives $650,000 in progress payments under the contract. Under the contract, X performed all of the services required in order to be entitled to receive the progress payments, and there was no obligation to return the payments or perform any additional services in order to retain the payments.

The most interesting account with the percentage of completion method relates to progress billings. With the completed contract method, there are no progress billings but rather deposits as the project progresses. With the percentage of completion method, the customer pays off the invoice as progress billings during the interim time period, thereby recognizing the net profit on a job as it progresses toward completion. Once the accounting cycle closes, the contractor will transfer the entire amount to the income statement that is in the progress billings. In recent consolidated cases, the Tax Court concluded that none of taxpayers’ contracts were home construction contracts and, therefore, were not eligible for the completed contract accounting method.

The cash basis of accounting recognizes revenues when cash is received, and expenses when they are paid. However, under the GAAP method, the income statement may see a sudden surge in revenue and expenses, especially if the company completes a large number of contracts in the same period. Because it recognizes both revenue and expenses at the end of the contract. There is also a 10% rule, whereby, if the taxpayer so elects, the recognition of income and the deduction of expenses can be delayed until the tax year in which at least 10% of the cumulative, allocable contract costs have been incurred. The main disadvantage of this method is that the contractor does not necessarily recognize the income in the period it is earned.

So, even if the contractor manages to complete the project before the stated deadline, he or she will still be paid as per the agreement. If there is an expectation of a loss on a contract, record it at once even under the completed contract method; do not wait until the end of the contract period to do so. % Completed is determined as costs incurred divided by estimated total costs.

The percentage of completion method is different because it often takes more than a year to complete the work, therefore the contractor wants to recognize his earnings as he progresses. Therefore the contract and the corresponding accounting is designed with this in mind. As the contractor invoices the customer for services and costs rendered, the customer owes the contractor this amount. So one key difference between the two methods is that invoicing occurs with the percentage of completion method, whereas with the completed contract method, invoicing does not exist. In these cases, the partnership is treated as both the old taxpayer and the new taxpayer for purposes of paragraphs and of this section. You have a construction contract worth $4 million to be completed over 3 years. Your actual costs for the 1st year turned out to be $300,000, which is less than 10% of the total estimated costs, so you did not report income or deduct expenses for that 1st year.

Popular Tax Topics

By the end of 2001, C has incurred $200,000 of allocable contract costs and estimates that the total allocable contract costs will be $800,000. By the end of 2002, C has incurred $600,000 of allocable contract costs and estimates that the total allocable contract costs will be $900,000. In 2003, after completing the contract, C determines that the actual cost to manufacture the item was $750,000. As a result of reversing the transaction under paragraph of this section, a taxpayer will have an adjusted basis in the retained property equal to the cumulative allocable contract costs reported under the contract in all prior taxable years. However, if the taxpayer received and retains any consideration or compensation from the customer, the taxpayer must reduce the adjusted basis in the retained property by the fair market value of that consideration or compensation.

With the percentage of completion method, the customer often accepts the project in incremental steps. As an incentive to finish the job there may be a retainage withheld from payments that is paid once the contract is complete. This method is somewhat similar to completed contract except it posts the costs and the revenue associated with those costs to the Income Statement every accounting cycle. The accounts follow the flow of how a percentage of completion method works. The key is that the percentage of completion method accumulates all items to the Balance Sheet during the interim accounting period and then using a process, transfers the cost and revenues earned to the income statement at the end of the cycle. Typically this is done when the work in progress schedule or job schedule is completed. Completed-contract method is a revenue recognition method in which the company does not recognize revenue and profits until the contract is complete.

When To Use A Completed Contract Method

The percentage of completion method is an accounting method in which the revenues and expenses of long-term contracts are reported as a percentage of the work completed. Businesses have multiple options when recognizing revenue in preparing their financial statements. Some companies prefer the cash method of accounting for revenue and expenses. The cash method recognizes revenue when cash is received from clients, and expenses are recorded when they’re paid. Although the cash method might be straightforward, it can delay recording revenue and expenses until the money is earned or paid out. The term completed-contract method refers to an accounting approach that delays the recognition of revenues and costs associated with long-term projects. The completed-contract method allows companies to accumulate revenues and costs on the balance sheet, but no charges or credits appear on the income statement until the project is completed and delivered to the buyer.

Application of the rules of this paragraph to a transaction that occurs on or after May 15, 2002 is not a change in method of accounting. Long-term contracts that qualify under §460 are contracts for the building, installation, construction, or manufacturing in which the contract is completed in a later tax year than when it was started. However, a manufacturing contract only qualifies if it is for the manufacture of a unique item for a particular customer or is an item that ordinarily takes more than 1 year to manufacture.

Accounting Method Alternatives For The Construction Contractor

Upon completion of the contract, Al’s Construction, Co. incurs $580,000 of totals costs for materials and labor. Al’s Construction, Co. will bill the owner for the entire $700,000 and recognize costs of $580,000, leaving $120,000 in profit in 2017.

In this method, all revenue and expenses will not be recognized, until the completion of the contract. If there is any unpredictability in collecting funds from customers, then this method is used. Amanda provides tax services to construction, specialty contractors, real estate development, and service businesses and their owners. Her responsibilities include income tax compliance, tax planning and consulting, and tax and accounting research. In short, when using the cash method, income and expenses are recognized when cash is received or when expenses are paid.

Who may use completed contract method?

Completed Contract Method

Except for home construction contracts, CCM can only be used by small contractors for contracts with an estimated life that does not exceed 2 years. There should be no terms in the contract with the only purpose of deferring tax.

This election is a method of accounting and, thus, applies to all long-term contracts entered into during and after the taxable year of the election. For purposes of applying the CCM in Year 2, the gross contract price is $800,000 (the sum of the amounts received under the contract and the amount treated as realized from the transaction ($650,000 + $150,000)) and the total allocable contract costs are $600,000. This profit must be allocated among W, X, Y, and Z as though the partnership closed its books on the date of the distribution.

How Does The Completed Contract Method Ccm Work?

The completed contract method may be the most popular method for accounting for long-term contracts exempt from the Percentage-of-Completion requirements. CCM works such that revenue and costs on contracts are not recognized for income tax purposes until the contract is completed—or over 95% complete—and can be used for its intended purpose. The CCM in many cases results in the largest deferral for income tax purposes. With the completed contract method, the project is accepted by the customer at the end of the project.

Contractors should think carefully about their long term business goals and tax liabilities before choosing. Here are two of the biggest factors construction businesses might want to consider when assessing the completed contract method of accounting. The completed contract method is one of the most popular accounting methods in the construction industry. It’s the preferred method for short-term contracts and residential projects because of its simplicity and the ability to shift costs and tax liability to the end of the project. The completed contract method has advantages, but it comes with risk as well. The completed-contract method of accounting helps to reduce the cost fluctuations associated with the long term projects. This method also motivates the contractor to apply cost and time-saving methods for the completion of the project as the compensation of the contractor does not change with the actual time taken to finish the project.